Wednesday, December 2, 2015

New arrangement


I've been quiet here, but I've been busy.

Firstly, I think Chaos is just about ready to upload to Createspace, and ultimately Amazon. I've edited the harp part, but I may have one more look through the score before finalizing it.

In the meantime, I've finish an arrangement of Remembering Child for a performance in Syracuse at the end of January (http://www.societyfornewmusic.org/concerts.cfm), and I'm expecting proofs in the mail in the next few days to approve. I'll post an announcement. This the first score with my own digital artwork, and I'm hoping it looks good. I'm not sure about the scaling of the jpeg. I may have to go back to one of their stock images. Someday, I hope I'll be able to supply real artwork for my covers.

I've also set the original version with piano, but it's too few pages to publish on Createspace. It's only 16 pages and the minimum is 24. Front matter takes it up to 18, but that is still 6 pages short. I could publish my sax quartet with it as a bonus, or possibly Mirage, which I haven't typeset yet, but it is only a couple of pages long. It's a solo alto piece with loads of multiphonics, key clicks, and pops. I might consult on it first. Some of the multiphonics are awkward, and I might try to find some notes with smoother fingerings approaching and leaving them.

There are two more works on the horizon. Firstly, I have another piece to write for the Society for New Music - for next season. Also, I've been sketching a wind ensemble piece based on Bach's harmonization and my reharmonization of Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott. I'll give more details on that later.

Sunday, June 21, 2015

That Saxophone Quartet ...

... is officially finished - for real, this time. 

A long time ago (in a far away land) Paul Bro asked me to write a quartet for the Chicago Saxophone Quartet. I never got a confirmation from him that they would perform it if I wrote it, nor was there any talk of a commission fee. At some point, I got some ideas and wrote them down. There was enough for a whole movement there, but I never got around to assembling it.

Several years ago, when I was teaching students how to use Sibelius, I gave each member of the class a page to typeset as an exercise in expanded techniques - all but the last page for some reason - either that or the person assigned the last page never turned in the assignment. About a year later, I appended the files together and considered it finished, but I didn't think I liked it enough to try to peddle for performances.

Lately, I have been reorganizing my manuscripts, and ran across it. I figured I had a little time to play with it, and decided to clean it up. I'm not sure I really like the beginning - I need to hear it - it's a style I was exploring in the mid-90s, but I've decided that I do like most of it.

It's not easy. Part of it is very fast (possibly too fast) and there are a number of quarter tones.

It's also too short to publish on CreateSpace - and not close enough to pad it with blank pages. I'm not sure what to do with it yet - add a title page and performance notes to get it up to 14 pages, and then put a 10 sample pages of From Her Husband's Hand and Inner Sanctum? I could put a few pages of Remembering the Night Sky in, too, but that isn't published yet, and I'm thinking of revising it first.

If anyone is interested in playing it, just send me an email.

Thursday, June 18, 2015

The New Sibelius

I don't get it. The new Sibelius doesn't really have any significant new features. Yes, there is annotation and being able to write with a pen (on a Surface Pro), but for those who have a mega setup and huge (non-touchscreen) monitor, that's nothing.

You can pay $89 for the upgrade for a perpetual license now. And then another $89 next year, and the following year for "free" upgrades and support. Sounds like $267 to me. I've been using Sibelius since version 1. I don't need support. If they are promising multiple annual upgrades, that's different - and by upgrades, I don't mean maintenance fixes. I don't like the subscription model.

Have they stopped developing Sibelius? Sounds like it. I can think of a lot of things they could fix, but it doesn't sound like they have made any changes in the notation direction.

Until I see a compelling reason to buy it, I guess I'm sticking with 7.5.

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Finished!

I finished Chaos today.

Yes, I FINISHED Chaos today. I'll probably have another look through it, and may not publish it for a while - after it has been given the OK by a couple of pianists that I've sent it to. I also need to have a look through the harp part. Some of the tunings may be impossible. (Chilali, do you want to look through it?)

Time to start doing all the stuff I'm supposed to be doing!


Monday, June 15, 2015

Long past due for an update

Chaos is nearly finished. I had a couple of urgent typesetting jobs that meant putting off the final work on the concerto. Over the past couple of days, I've filled the partial gaps. (There were no real gaps, just three places where not all of the material was present.) Today, I've bridged the last one, although I'll put the last few notes in when I key the last section into Sibelius. I've made annotations what to do there.

I have a few small amendments to put in earlier in the piece - in what you might call the second movement, and then I need to sculpt the dynamics.

In any case, I'm now to the 99% mark on the first draft. Sibelius says it is only 15 minutes long, but I think it's actually more like 20, since it said Chaos Theory (the middle section of Chaos, plus a new beginning) was 8 minutes, and it was almost 11.

Once I finish tinkering, I'll send it out to my pianist friends (and acquaintances), including the pianist for whom I was originally writing, in case she is still interested. I'll also send it out to the conductor who commissioned it, with the understanding that the orchestra who withdrew the commission will never play it.

I must also confess, this isn't an ordinary concerto. It's more like a piece for piano and orchestra, where the two are relatively equal. There is too much in the piano part to call it an orchestra piece, and it really needs to be out in front. The second movement is more concerto like, for part of it anyway.

If anyone is interested in taking a look at it, I'd be happy to send a pdf.

Sunday, April 19, 2015

Naming

One of my goals over the next couple of weeks is to finally finish the concerto that I was working on when I started this diary.

At that point, if it no longer becomes a diary for that concerto, is this blog over? Of course, I'm sketching a double concerto next, so maybe that will take the baton.